Hearing on National Security Leaks Features Much Media-Bashing, Little Progress
Charles Carreon v. Matthew Inman, et al.
FunnyJunk, LLC vs. TheOatmeal.com
Coming Soon? Graduated Response Measures by Internet Service Providers
Brief for July 2012
Scott v. WorldStarHipHop, Inc.
Jacobson v. "Almostinnocentbystander"
Stolen Valor, Part II: The Legislative and Executive Branches Take the Hint
ANNOUNCEMENT: Panel and Fundraiser for "Without My Consent"
Lèse Majesté: 16th Century Censorship Meets 21st Century Law
Hermès International v. Does
Beaverton Grace Bible Church v. Smith
Nevada Needs A Revised Anti-SLAPP Statute, But The Ninth Circuit Gives Us Some Daylight
Hoang v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Does Washington State's SB 6251 Require Online Classified Sites to Monitor All Third-Party Content?
Hey! You Defamed Me (By Not Saying Anything About Me)!
Leakers and the First Amendment
Falsity and the First Amendment: The U.S. Supreme Court Rules on the Stolen Valor Act
Art of Living Foundation v. Does 1-10
Pages
![Subscribe to Digital Media Law Project RSS](https://www.dmlp.org/misc/feed.png)
Description:
On December 14, 2011, as part of a criminal investigation conducted by the District Attorney of Suffolk County and the Boston Police Department, the District Attorney issued an administrative subpoena under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 271, Section 17B and 18 U.S.C. Section 2703, demanding that Twitter provide subscriber information regarding accounts "Guido Fawkes," "@p0isAn0N," "@OccupyBoston," and the hashtags "#BostonPD" and "#d0xcak3." Despite the District Attorney's request for secrecy, Twitter forwarded the subpoena to the relevant users in accordance with its notification policy with regards to law enforcement.
According to a statement by the ACLU of Massachusetts, the ACLU moved to have the subpoena quashed on First Amendment grounds. Superior Court Judge Carol Ball held a closed hearing on December 29, 2011, and then ordered that the record of the proceedings and all documents filed by the parties be impounded by the court.
On January 9, 2012, the ACLU of Massachusetts contested Judge Ball's order by filing a motion for reconsideration of the decision to seal all documents involving the motion to quash. This motion was not successful.
On February 23, 2012, Superior Court Judge Frances A. McIntyre issued an ex parte order to show cause to Twitter regarding the administrative subpoena, ordering Twitter to appear in Suffolk Superior Court on February 27, 2012. After this hearing on February 27, 2012, Judge McIntyre ordered Twitter to comply with the Suffolk District Attorney Office's subpoena as amended by February 28, 2012. At that time, Judge McIntyre also removed the seal from three pages worth of documents, consisting of the ex parte order to show cause and the amended administrative subpoena. According to news sources, Twitter has complied.