Publication of Private Facts
Publication of Private Facts in New York
Publication of Private Facts in New Jersey
Publication of Private Facts in Michigan
Publication of Private Facts in Massachusetts
Publication of Private Facts in Indiana
Publication of Private Facts in Illinois
Publication of Private Facts in Georgia
Publication of Private Facts in Florida
Publication of Private Facts in the District of Columbia
Publication of Private Facts in California
State Law: Publication of Private Facts
Practical Tips for Avoiding Private Facts, Misappropriation, and Right of Publicity Claims
Publication of Private Facts
Publishing Personal and Private Information
Evans v. Evans
Evans v. Evans: Appellate Court Throws Out Prior Restraint
Frisco Fairways Homeowners Association v. Snell
Perez Hilton v. Jonathan Jaxson
Perez Hilton Sues Fellow Gossip-Blogger For Defamation Over Alleged Sex Tapes
Pages

Description:
In March 2007, Thomas Evans, a deputy sheriff in the San Diego County Sheriff's Department, sued his former wife, Linda Evans, and her mother, Shirley Preddy, for defamation, harassment, invasion of privacy, and other claims. After Thomas and Linda Evans divorced in 2002, they engaged in a bitter dispute in family court over custody of their child, child support, and other issues. Thomas filed a separate lawsuit in California court after Linda and her mother allegedly posted false statements about him on various Internet websites and filed two written complaints with his employer. Thomas also alleged that Linda and Preddy published information from his medical and financial records on the Internet.
The trial court granted Thomas a preliminary injunction that prohibited Linda and Preddy from: (1) publishing "false and defamatory statements" about Thomas on the Internet; (2) publishing "confidential personal information" about Thomas on the Internet; and (3) contacting Thomas's employer regarding Thomas except to call 911 to report criminal conduct. Linda appealed, and the appellate court reversed the ruling of the district court. It held that the preliminary injunction was an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech, and that it was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. The court remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. On the issue of Linda's alleged publication of Thomas's private information, the appellate court instructed the lower court to identify precisely what information Thomas seeks to protect and to balance his privacy rights (and the safety issues involved in disclosing personal information about a police officer) against the free-speech interests in publication.
Sometime before the appellate court ruled on the appeal, Thomas dismissed Preddy from the case, leaving Linda as the only defendant.