Retractions and Corrections

Correcting or Retracting Your Work After Publication

As you publish your work online you may want to correct things you have previously published. This may occur when someone contacts you and asks you to correct or retract your statements, or, you might decide on your own that something you've published needs to be changed. While the terms correction and retraction are sometimes used interchangeably, in general, a correction alerts your audience to factual errors that do not take away from your main point, while a retraction informs your audience of factual errors that impact the main point of the statements.

Georgia Community Support and Solutions v. Berryhill (Correspondence)

Date: 

01/01/2005

Threat Type: 

Correspondence

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Shirley Berryhill

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Legal Counsel: 

Torin D. Togut

Publication Medium: 

Email
Website

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Lawsuit Filed

Description: 

Georgia Community Support and Solutions, Inc. (GCSS), a non-profit organization that provides assistance to disabled adults and their families, sent a cease-and-desist letter to Shirley Berryhill, a mother who made critical comments about GCSS in a web posting and in emails to employees of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Georgia Department of Human Resources. In these communications, Berryhill claimed that her son was receiving poor treatment and care from a GCSS-referred service. After Berryhill refused to retract and apologize for the statements she made, GCSS filed suit. See our related database entry, Georgia Community Support and Solutions, Inc. v. Berryhill (Lawsuit).

Jurisdiction: 

Content Type: 

Subject Area: 

CMLP Notes: 

Dig for more information on the correspondence. The appeals court decision mentions it (on Westlaw at 620 S.E.2d 178). {MCS}

Updated 7/08/2008 (JMC)- Unable to locate cease and desist letter. Maybe I can call Georgia Legal Services, 1100 Spring St, Atlanta, Georgia 30309-2846, Fulton County County, (404) 656-6021 because Torin Togut is no longer listed as employed at Georgia Legal Services.

Priority: 

2-Normal

Case Testing Illinois' New Anti-SLAPP Law Settles Before Court Can Clarify Reach of Citizen Participation Act

In what would have been the first case to test Illinois' newly enacted Citizen Participation Act, which provides immunity for speech related to certain matters of government and public concern, the parties settled before a court could interpret this important addition to the growing list of state anti-SLAPP laws.

Jurisdiction: 

Subject Area: 

Jaeger v. Okon

Date: 

05/11/2007

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Joy Okon; Thomas Okon

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Court Type: 

State

Court Name: 

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois

Case Number: 

07-L-004940

Legal Counsel: 

Daliah Saper (Saper Law Offices)

Publication Medium: 

Blog
Email

Relevant Documents: 

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Retraction Issued
Settled (total)

Description: 

Bloggers Joy and Tom Okon, operators of North Center Neighbors, a blog that covers happenings in the North Center neighborhood of Chicago, were sued by James Jaeger and his development company for defamation. Jaeger's complaint alleges that the Okons defamed him by posting statements on their blog (and sending emails) that implied that he had bribed government officials and engaged in dishonest business practices.

The dispute arose in the context of a controversial development project led by Jaeger's development company in the North Center neighborhood. Tom Okon, voicing his frustration with the development project, organized community opposition to the project and published several posts in May 2007 that were critical of Jaeger. According to Jaeger's amended complaint, Okon made the following false and defamatory statements on the blog:

  • Our meeting with the chamber that we thought would be friendly and amicable turned out to be a sham. Based on prior meetings and statements, I thought we had support from key members of the Chamber. That support now appears to be non—existent. The Chamber seems to have swallowed Jim Jaegers [sic] BS hook line and sinker. I guess the large $3,500 donation he gave them really did the trick.

  • Well it seems [the Chamber of Commerce] only care about how much money and power they have. Perhaps Mr. Jaeger also personally wrote them each a check... who knows for sure...

  • This comes down now to business against residents. The businesses want more density and more people on Irving Park Road so they can line their pockets. They care nothing about our safety or quality of life. They would be happy to see Irving Park Road so crowded you can not even walk down it, as long as those people are waiting in line to patronize the businesses. [...] This developer is one of the worst offender’s [sic] of that practice.

On July 27, 2007, the Okons filed a motion to dismiss on the basis that their statements were matters of opinion protected by the First Amendment and therefore not actionable as defamation. On October 5, 2007, the judge denied the motion to dismiss without explanation and ordered the parties to proceed to discovery.

After a limited period of discovery, the Okons filed a second motion to dismiss under Illinois' newly enacted Citizen Participation Act, which provides immunity for speech related to certain matters of government and public concern. The Act mandates that all discovery should be suspended pending a decision on such a motion and that the movants are entitled to attorney’s fees and costs if they prevail.

While the Okons' motion was pending, the case settled. According to a report in the Chicago Journal, the parties settled sometime in April 2008:

[Tom Okon] said he learned on Saturday that the case had been settled out of court in an agreement reached by both his and Jaeger's attorneys. The details, of course, "are confidential," Okon said. He added, though that "it only cost me $20,000." The original lawsuit, according to the Okons, demanded $100,000 from them.

On April 24, Tom Okon posted an apology on North Center Neighbors, stating in part:

We have never had, and do not now have, any reason to believe that Mr. Jaeger ever made inappropriate payments to any organization, nor that he ever received any favorable treatment from the North Center Chamber of Commerce or any other political entity. We never had, and do not now have, any reason to believe that Mr. Jaeger ever engaged in deceptive or evil behavior.

Jurisdiction: 

Content Type: 

Subject Area: 

Parker v. X17, Inc.

Date: 

12/19/2007

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

X17, Inc.; X17online.com; Does 1-20

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Organization

Court Type: 

State

Court Name: 

Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County

Case Number: 

SC096464

Legal Counsel: 

Turner Green Afrasiabi & Arledge LLP

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Relevant Documents: 

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Retraction Issued
Settled (total)

Description: 

In December 2007, Tony Parker sued X17, Inc., the operator of X17online.com, a celebrity news and gossip website, alleging libel and false light invasion of privacy. According to Parker's complaint, which was filed in California state court, X17 published a series of online articles claiming that Parker had cheated on his wife, Eva Longeria, with "supposed" French model Alexandra Paressant. Parker maintains that this information is false. The complaint seeks $20 million in damages.

Update:

4/4/2008 - X17 published a retraction and an apology to Parker. 

Jurisdiction: 

Content Type: 

Subject Area: 

CMLP Notes: 

Status updated on 6/6/2008.  Although X17 published a retraction and several gossip sites say that a settlement has been reached, I couldn't find any primary sources to support settlement. (AAB)

Patches the Beaver v. AsteroidBooty.com

Date: 

11/23/2007

Threat Type: 

Other

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

AsteroidBooty.com

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Material Removed

Description: 

A blog post on AsteroidBooty.com, an anonymous blog focused on "chronicles from outerspace, products that rock my world, and more," criticized the high price of children's books and contrasted the prices with the (asserted) easiness of writing the books. The post also included a link to the children's book "Patches the Beaver," making a joke about the possible sexual interpretation of the book's title. Along with this link, the post included an image of the book's cover, and a photograph of the book's author Shane Gauthier. Subsequent user comments also poked fun at the title of the book, adding comments about the author's appearance, possible sexual preferences, and his alleged lack of awareness of diversity and multiculturalism issues.

Gauthier's lawyer posted a comment on the blog threatening legal action against AsteroidBooty if the site operator did not remove the post and comments and issue a public apology. The defamation claims primarily involved content posted by the guest commentors; however, the threat stated that "[l]iability for publication of a defamatory statement extends to all those who participate in its dissemination." The comment also noted that damage awards for defamation claims can exceed $250,000.

The operator of AsteroidBooty said in another blog post that she did not receive the comment at first as it seemed to have gotten mixed in with "400+ spam comments." She instead found out about the threat when her webhost called her and sent an e-mail asking her to either remove the content or send a counter-notice that she did not believe it was defamatory.

After locating and reading the threatening comment, the operator of AsteroidBooty removed the disputed content and issued an apology on her blog, noting that "it was all in jest; so I have no problem taking it down. And most of the stuff I wrote was directed towards children’s books in general (not Shane)."

Content Type: 

Subject Area: 

CMLP Notes: 

Caved! And the legal claims were so weak. Arg. {MCS}

User submitted via threat form

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Retractions and Corrections