Massachusetts courts have not formerly adopted a common law claim for intrusion. Instead, Massachusetts has a statute that defines intrusion as an "unreasonable, substantial or serious interference with privacy." M.G.L. c. 214, Section 1B . Although the courts in...
Search Results
Intrusion law in Michigan does not differ in any significant way from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See DeMay v. Roberts, 9 N.W. 146 (Mich. 1881) (recognizing the intrusion tort); Duran v. Detroit News, 504 N.W.2d 715...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 3:45pm - 0 comments -
Intrusion law in New Jersey does not differ in any significant way from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See Hennessey v. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co., 609 A.2d 11, 17 (N.J. 1992). As result, you should follow the general...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 3:47pm - 0 comments -
New York courts do not recognize intrusion upon seclusion claims. See Howell v. New York Post Co. , 612 N.E.2d 699, 703 (N.Y. 1993). Courts in New York do, however, recognize causes of action for trespass and other illegal acts committed during the course of newsgathering...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 7:26pm - 0 comments -
Intrusion law in North Carolina does not differ in any significant way from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See Miller v. Brooks , 472 S.E.2d 350, 353-55 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996). As result, you should follow the general...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 11:12pm - 0 comments -
Intrusion law in Ohio does not differ in any significant way from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See Sustin v. Fee, 431 N.E.2d 992, 993-94 (Ohio 1982). As result, you should follow the general advice outlined in the...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 11:19pm - 0 comments -
Intrusion law in Pennsylvania does not differ signicantly from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See Harris v. Easton Pub. Co. , 483 A.2d 1377 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1984). As result, you should follow the general advice...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 11:23pm - 0 comments -
Intrusion law in Texas does not differ substantially from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See Billings v. Atkinson, 489 S.W.2d 858, 859 (Tex. 1973). As result, you should follow the general advice outlined in the...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 11:29pm - 0 comments -
Virginia does not recognize intrusion claims. See WJLA-TV v. Levin , 564 S.E.2d 383, 395 n.5 (2002). However, there are several related causes of action that exist in Virginia. First, it is a crime in Virginia to knowingly and intentionally videotape, photograph, or film...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 11:31pm - 0 comments -
Intrusion law in Washington does not differ signicantly from the law described in the General Elements of an Intrusion Claim section of this guide. See Doe v. Gonzaga University , 143 Wn.2d 687, 705-06 (2001). As result, you should follow the general advice outlined in the...
DMLP Staff - 03/01/2008 - 11:34pm - 0 comments -
